DoD Signals Increased Scrutiny of Gov Con M&A and Renewed Interest in Background IP RightsFebruary 28, 2022
A Labor of Love? Biden E.O. Pushes Use of Project Labor Agreements on Large-Scale Federal Construction ProjectsFebruary 28, 2022
VA Tries to Argue Lease Amendment Lacked Consideration, But CBCA Won’t Let Agency Wriggle Out of Commitment; 1425-1429 Snyder Realty, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 6433February 25, 2022
Protester Already Had an Outstanding Rating, So Agency’s Failure to Assign Additional Strengths Wasn’t Prejudicial; Chevo Consulting, LLC, GAO B-20242, B-420242.2February 25, 2022
Protester Didn’t Challenge Eligibility of Intervening Offeror And Thus Was Not an Interested Party to Raise Additional Protest Grounds; Kearney & Company, PC, GAO B-420331, B-420331.2February 25, 2022
The Squeaky Wheel Gets Dismissed: GAO Reinforces the Need for Contractor Vigilance When Raising Pre-Award Issues With the AgencyFebruary 25, 2022
Biden Executive Order to Require Project Labor Agreements for Federal Procurement Construction Projects, and MoreFebruary 25, 2022
Anduril CRO: ‘There Is No Fair Competition’ for Non-Traditional Companies in DefenseFebruary 25, 2022
Agency Improperly Based Award Decision on Quotation Composed of Submission from Two Different Vendors; Softrams, LLC; Chags Health Information Technology, LLC, GAO B-419927.4 et al.February 24, 2022
Contractor Doesn’t Have a Property Interest in “Being Allowed to Compete Fairly”; Sunrez Corporation v. United States, COFC No. 21-568February 24, 2022
No Error in Agency’s Consideration of Allegedly Irrelevant CPARS; Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC, GAO B-420299February 24, 2022
Court of Federal Claims Judge Splits from Precedent Regarding the Availability of Key PersonnelFebruary 24, 2022
New Executive Order Requires Project Labor Agreements on Large Federal Construction ProjectsFebruary 24, 2022
Agency Cancels Third-Party Software License But Original Vendor Still Claims InfringementFebruary 24, 2022
