Construction Industry Groups Voice Frustration Over President Biden’s Pro-Labor Executive OrderMarch 2, 2022
Court of Federal Claims Declines to Adopt GAO’s Rule for Post-Proposal Key Personnel ChangesMarch 2, 2022
Defense Firms Brace for Billions of Dollars in New Taxes, And Hope for Congressional ReliefMarch 2, 2022
Contractor Can’t Prove that Pandemic Impeded Its Performance; Appeal of Central Company, ASBCA No. 62624March 1, 2022
Agency Reasonably Rejected SBIR Proposal that Wasn’t Directed to Any Specific “Area of Interest”; Front End Analytics, LLC, GAO B-420024.2 B-420024.3March 1, 2022
Agency Decision to Take Corrective Action in Response to Second Protest Doesn’t Make Initial Protest “Clearly Meritorious”; WILL Technology, Inc.–Costs, GAO B-419815.6March 1, 2022
Court Affirms OHA Decision Finding Concern Was Ineligible for Award as an SDVOSB; Superior Optical Labs, Inc. v. United States, COFC No. 21-cv-01580March 1, 2022
COFC Splits with GAO on Whether Contractors Must Notify Agency of Changes to Key Personnel AvailabilityMarch 1, 2022
Federal Circuit Reverses COFC, Reaffirms that Protester Has Standing If They Would Have Opportunity to Participate in New Procurement; VAS Realty, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. 2021-1962February 28, 2022
Agency Appropriately Penalized Offeror for Typos in Proposal; Zermount, Inc, GAO B-420174, B-420174.2February 28, 2022
Preference for Contractor with Nuclear Safety Experience Was Not Unduly Restrictive; Government and Military Certification Systems, Inc., GAO B-4210241.2February 28, 2022
