The Solicitation May Impose Risk on the Eventual Contractor, But that Doesn’t Mean Offerors Can’t Intelligently CompeteMay 17, 2024
The Solicitation Didn’t Require a Price Realism Evaluation, But That Didn’t Stop the Protester from Challenging the Awardee’s Low PriceMay 16, 2024
Protester Alleged Agency Ignored Information in Its Proposal. But GAO Said Agency Couldn’t Ignore What Wasn’t There.May 16, 2024
Protester Satisfied Prerequisites for an “Outstanding” Rating But Received a “Good.” GAO Didn’t See a Problem.May 15, 2024
Agency Conducted Exchanges with the Awardee But Not the Protester. Why Didn’t This Amount to Unequal Discussions?May 14, 2024
You May Be the Incumbent, But Don’t Expect the Agency to Assume You Understand the RequirementsMay 13, 2024
Protester Said Agency’s “Concerns” Were Weaknesses that Should’ve Been Raised in Discussions. Why Wasn’t GAO Convinced?May 10, 2024
Can a Corrective Action and a Reevaluation Revive an Argument that Wasn’t Raised in the Initial Protest?May 7, 2024
Why Was this Non-Protesting Offeror Allowed to Intervene in Another Offeror’s Pre-Award Protest?May 3, 2024
Protested Wanted More Time to Prepare Bid for Pressure Washing Services. GAO Wasn’t Sympathetic.May 3, 2024
Protester’s Experience References Had Higher Contract Values than Awardee’s. Did This Make the Protester’s References More Relevant?May 2, 2024
Awardee’s Staffing Levels Were Lower than Government’s Estimate, But that Didn’t Mean Its Costs Were UnrealisticMay 2, 2024
Protester Said Past Performance Evaluation Overemphasized Negatives. Why Did GAO Think It Was Fair?April 30, 2024