Requirement to Propose Loaded Labor Rates Does Not Mean Offerors Must Provide Direct Compensation Rates; FEDSYNC BEI, LLC, GAO B-417492, B-417492.2September 9, 2019
Supplementation of Record Unnecessary for Court to Decide Reasonableness of Restrictive Requirement; Chromalloy San Diego Corporation v. United States, COFC No. 19-974CSeptember 6, 2019
Protester Eliminated from Competition Lacks Standing to Challenge Change in Agency Requirements; TRAX International Corporation v. United States, COFC 19-685CSeptember 5, 2019
COFC Lacks Jurisdiction Over Protest of Award Made Under DoD’s Other Transactions Authority; Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. United States, COFC No. 19-742CSeptember 4, 2019
Agency Not Required to Use Best Available Price Evaluation Methodology; WellPoint Military Care Corporation v. United States, COFC No. 19-676CSeptember 3, 2019
Failure to Propose Personnel with Required Qualifications Was Not a “Minor Detail” that Agency Could Overlook; ARServices, Limited, GAO B-417561, B-417561.2September 3, 2019
Reconsideration of Protest Unwarranted Where Parties Ignored Solicitation Amendment that Could Have Negated Protest; General Services Administration; SBD Alliant, LLC—Reconsideration and Modification of Remedy, GAO B-417126.5, B-417126.6September 3, 2019
Agency’s Market Research Supported Decision to Set Aside Procurement for Small Businesses; Sourcelinq, LLC, GAO B-417279.2August 30, 2019
Agency Was Not Required to Qualitatively Assess Offerors’ Corporate Experience; Ausley Associates, Inc., GAO B-417509, B-417509.2, B-417509.3August 30, 2019
Background in “Preparing for Board Meetings” Does Not Merit a High Corporate Experience Rating; Jefferson Consulting Group, LLC, GAO B-417555, B-417555.2August 29, 2019
Proposal Sunk by Generalities and Conclusory Statements; NikSoft Systems Corporation, GAO B-415716.28, B-415716.33August 29, 2019
Protest Filed a Month After Award Still Timely Due to Errors in Award Notice; Gulf Civilization General Trading & Contracting Company, GAO B-417586August 28, 2019
Failure to Distinguish Proposal from Other Higher-Rated Proposals Dooms Protester’s Standing; Zeidman Technologies, Inc. v. United States, COFC No. 17-1662CAugust 27, 2019
Seven-Day Response Time Reasonable for Solicitation Seeking Commercial Items; Warrior Service Company, GAO B-417574August 26, 2019
Protester’s Concession that It Could Not Perform Allegedly Restrictive Requirement Negated Its Interested Party Status; Israel Aerospace Industries, GAO B-417681August 26, 2019
Related Case Pending in District Court Did Not Impact COFC’s Tucker Act Jurisdiction; State of Oklahoma et al. v. United States, COFC No. 19-1022CAugust 23, 2019
Change to the Small Business Act Does Not Affect Solicitation Until SBA Promulgates a Rule Implementing the Change; TechAnax, LLC; Rigil Corporation, GAO B-408685.22, B-408685.25August 23, 2019
Agency’s Rejection of Quote that Was 90 Seconds Late Did Not Undermine Competition; Criterion Systems, Inc. v. United States, COFC No. 19-593CAugust 22, 2019
Post-Award Challenge to Fairness of Procurement is Untimely; American Justice Solutions, Inc., GAO -B-417171.2August 22, 2019
Instruction to “Please Include” Government-Provided Prices in Proposal was a Requirement, not a Suggestion; Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United States, COFC 18-61CAugust 21, 2019
