★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/It Looked Like the Contractor Destroyed Evidence. Why Didn’t the COFC Impose Sanctions?
Claims·Protests & Claims Brief

It Looked Like the Contractor Destroyed Evidence. Why Didn’t the COFC Impose Sanctions?

The government sought an adverse inference sanction after the contractor's counsel lost her entire email inbox during litigation, arguing the contractor intentionally destroyed evidence.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Filed Underadverse inferencediscovery disputeselectronically stored informationemail deletiongovernment contractsintent to deprivelitigation holdprivilege waiverRCFC 37(e)spoliation sanctions
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.