★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/Surety Need Not Use the Words “In Default” When Notifying Government of Intent to Exercise Right of Equitable Subrogation; COFC No. 16-999C, The Hanover Insurance Co. v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Surety Need Not Use the Words “In Default” When Notifying Government of Intent to Exercise Right of Equitable Subrogation; COFC No. 16-999C, The Hanover Insurance Co. v. United States

In a claim for equitable subrogation before the Court of Federal Claims, the government’s motion for summary judgment is denied where the government failed to establish that the appellant had not provided notice that the contractor had defaulted on its bond agreement with the appellant.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.