★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Supreme Court to Determine Whether False Claims Act Liability Is Precluded Where Defendants Proffer an Objectively Reasonable Interpretation of an Ambiguous Legal Requirement
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Supreme Court to Determine Whether False Claims Act Liability Is Precluded Where Defendants Proffer an Objectively Reasonable Interpretation of an Ambiguous Legal Requirement

On January 13, 2023, the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to petitioners in two False Claims Act cases to determine whether the False Claims Act’s knowledge requirement reaches defendants who can offer an “objectively reasonable” interpretation of an ambiguous legal or contractual requirement material to government payment.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.