★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Supreme Court to Review Statute of Limitations Question in False Claims Act Case
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Supreme Court to Review Statute of Limitations Question in False Claims Act Case

The National Whistleblower Center has filed an amicus curiae brief in Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Hunt, a case going to the Supreme Court to settle a three-way splint between circuit courts interpreting the statute of limitations specified by the False Claims Act.

The brief argues that the plain language of the statute supports the Eleventh Circuit’s interpretation, saying the law “clearly states that the ten-year statute of limitations applies equally to both relators and government officials and to any civil action brought under section 3730.”

It further asserts that the FCA’s first to file bar is the primary method of ensuring FCA complaints are filed promptly and not the statute of limitations. Under the first to file provision, those who file later are barred from receiving a whistleblower reward in a qui tam lawsuit.

More at Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.