★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/In-Sourcing Decisions Within Court’s Bid Protest Jurisdiction; COFC No. 17-934C, Mail Transportation Inc. et al v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

In-Sourcing Decisions Within Court’s Bid Protest Jurisdiction; COFC No. 17-934C, Mail Transportation Inc. et al v. United States

Government’s motion to dismiss a complaint regarding the termination of mail delivery contracts in anticipation of conversion to government performance is denied, where the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction to hear allegations of procurement violations at any stage of the process, including challenges to in-sourcing decisions; and plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction blocking the termination of their contracts is denied, where contrary to the contractors’ assertions, the government did consider and compare the costs of performance using contractors or government employees.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.