★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Res Judicata Does Not Bar Claims Raised in Private Suit That Did Not Seek FCA Recovery; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 20-2027, U.S. and Pennsylvania ex rel. Alisha Alejandro v. Philadelphia Vision Center, et al.
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Res Judicata Does Not Bar Claims Raised in Private Suit That Did Not Seek FCA Recovery; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 20-2027, U.S. and Pennsylvania ex rel. Alisha Alejandro v. Philadelphia Vision Center, et al.

The district court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss a qui tam case under the doctrine of res judicata.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.