Protester Not Prejudiced When Agency Upgrade Past Performance Ratings for Its and Awardee’s Proposals Equally; COFC No. 16-1316C, By Light Professional IT Services Inc. v. United States

Protest challenging the agency’s past performance evaluation is denied, where the solicitation and agency evaluation notices clearly put the protester on notice that it must provide a task order number with any project reference performed under a base IDIQ contract, and where the agency’s decision to upgrade the ratings of the awardee’s and protester’s past performance from somewhat relevant to relevant was not prejudicial, because the awardee received an equal benefit.