★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/Perhaps Submitting a Signature Card from a Bank that No Longer Exists Was Not the Best Way to Prove SDVOSB Eligibility
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Protests & Claims Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Perhaps Submitting a Signature Card from a Bank that No Longer Exists Was Not the Best Way to Prove SDVOSB Eligibility

The VA’s Center for Verification and Evaluation (CVE) requested documents from an SDVOSB as part of a verification examination. CVE determined that the documents the company submitted—including a 19-year old bank card from a bank that ceased to exist after 2008—were not sufficient. CVE cancelled the company’s SDVOSB status. The company appealed the cancellation. OHA denied the appeal, finding CVE was within its rights to cancel an SDVOSB verification when the firm doesn’t adequately respond to a document request.

CVE Appeal of Komplete Systems Integrators, Inc., SBA No. CVE-244-A

Background

The VA’s Center for Verification and Evaluation verified Komplete Systems Integrators as an SDVOSB in 2012. In 2022, as part of a verification examination, CVE asked Komplete to produce various documents, including payroll information, recent rental payments, and signature card identifying all authorized users on the business bank account.

In response to the request, Komplete submitted a document purporting to show the wages of individuals associated with the company. Komplete also submitted a 2003 signature card from Wachovia bank, even though Wachovia had not existed as a bank since 2008.

CVE determined these submissions were not sufficient and thus cancelled Komplete’s status as an SDVOSB. Komplete appealed to the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Analysis

Under CVE regulations, if a concern fails to make required submissions in response to a CVE request, CVE can cancel that firm’s verified status. Here, CVE had asked Komplete for documents. Komplete submitted documents that were deficient or non-responsive. OHA could not conclude that CVE had improperly cancelled Komplete’s status.

Komplate asked that OHA consider various new exhibits pertaining to eligibility that the company had submitted as part of its appeal. OHA, however, reasoned that it will only consider evidence outside the record if good cause is shown. Komplete had not demonstrated why good caused existed.

Komplete is represented by its CEO, Kevin L. Doby.

–Case summary by Craig LaChance, Senior Editor

[pdf-embedder url=”https://staging.pub-k.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/SBA-Komplete-Systems-Integrators.pdf” title=”SBA – Komplete Systems Integrators”]

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.