★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Malicious Prosecution Case Should Be Handled in District Where Underlying Qui Tam was Filed; United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:20-cv-00639, Marietta Area Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Michael A. King, et al.
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Malicious Prosecution Case Should Be Handled in District Where Underlying Qui Tam was Filed; United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:20-cv-00639, Marietta Area Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Michael A. King, et al.

The district court granted a motion to change venue in favor of the defendants in a lawsuit alleging malicious prosecution and tortious interference in connection with a qui tam complaint.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.