History is History – Qui Tam Provisions No FCA Mystery
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti – Kenney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Jonathan Meyer v ADS Clinics, LLC, on February 10, 2026, rejected a most recent attempt to gut the qui tam provisions from the federal False Claims Act (FCA) based on the Appointments, Vesting, and Take Care Clauses of Article II of the United States Constitution.
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
$750/year