★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Healthcare and Government Contractors Beware: False Claims Act’s “Objective Falsity” Requirement Dispute Between Circuits Persists Following Denial of Cert by U.S. Supreme Court
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Healthcare and Government Contractors Beware: False Claims Act’s “Objective Falsity” Requirement Dispute Between Circuits Persists Following Denial of Cert by U.S. Supreme Court

Due to COVID-19, there have been a significant amount of economic incentive programs and government contract opportunities to assist in stimulus and responding to the crisis. This is in addition to the typical government procurement and healthcare costs reimbursements by the government. When individuals or entities interact with the government, there is False Claims Act (FCA) liability associated with monies that were not properly earned or claimed. At times, whether a claim was actually false is in dispute and reasonable minds may disagree. On February 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined certiorari to hear two petitions, which would have resolved a circuit court split regarding whether the FCA requires “objective falsity” of information or a claim to establish liability.

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.