★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Fraudulent Acquisition of Healthcare Entity Did Not Implicate Later Claims for Medicare Reimbursement; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 3:19-cv-18753-FLW-ZNQ, U.S. ex rel. David Freedman v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc., et al.
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Fraudulent Acquisition of Healthcare Entity Did Not Implicate Later Claims for Medicare Reimbursement; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 3:19-cv-18753-FLW-ZNQ, U.S. ex rel. David Freedman v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc., et al.

The district court dismissed a complaint alleging fraud on government healthcare programs, finding that the relator had not connected the underlying fraud to any claims for payment.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.