★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/Crediting Awardee for Innovative Approach Not an Unstated Evaluation Criteria; COFC No. 15-1351C, McConnell Jones Lanier & Murphy LLP v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Crediting Awardee for Innovative Approach Not an Unstated Evaluation Criteria; COFC No. 15-1351C, McConnell Jones Lanier & Murphy LLP v. United States

Protest challenging the agency’s evaluation of technical proposals is denied, where the agency did not apply an unstated evaluation criteria by crediting the awardee for its innovation approach and where the agency reasonably concluded a minor difference between the awardee’s proposed staffing level and the government estimate to be insignificant; and protest challenging the agency’s cost realism analysis is denied, where the contracting officer reasonably attributed differences between the awardee’s proposed costs and the government estimate to the awardee’s technical approach.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.