Contractor Paid Using More Favorable Exchange Rate than Permitted in Contract Not Prejudiced or Entitled to Damages; COFC Nos. 16-446C, Omran Holding Group, Inc. v. United States
Appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision denying a claim for underpayment is denied, where the Army used the incorrect exchange rate identified in the contract’s Local Currency Clause, but the rate used by the Army to pay the Afghani contractor was more favorable than the rate required by the contract.
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
$750/year
