Department of Labor Issues New Health & Welfare Fringe Benefits Rates for Contracts Covered by the Service Contract ActAugust 9, 2017
Defense Contractor Billed Government for Porsches, Million-Dollar Salaries and Secret GunsAugust 9, 2017
Well-Documented Consideration and Rejection of More Expensive Proposal with Only Slight Technical Benefit is Unobjectionable; GAO B-414189.2, Enhanced Veterans Solutions, Inc.August 9, 2017
Submission of Confidentiality Agreement in Place of Required Teaming Agreement Not a Clerical Error That Can Be Cured with Clarifications; GAO B-414591, Defense Base Services, Inc.August 9, 2017
Draft Cybersecurity Legislation Would Impose Substantial New Obligations on Vendors Selling Interconnected Devices to the US GovernmentAugust 8, 2017
Conflict Between Solicitation, Amendment Should Have Been Questioned Prior to Deadline for Proposals; COFC No. 17-80C, QTC Medical Services Inc. v. United StatesAugust 8, 2017
Area Office Did Not Consider Whether Awardee Was in Violation of Ostensible Subcontractor Rule; SBA No. SIZ-5835, Size Appeal of The Frontline GroupAugust 8, 2017
Appellants Cannot Recover Full Costs for Partially Successful Challenge of Terminated Contracts; PSBCA No. 6583, Cook Mail Carriers Inc.—CostsAugust 7, 2017
Protester’s Eligibility for Award Did Not Factor into Decision to Take Corrective Action; COFC No. 17-362, American Sanitary Products Inc. v. United StatesAugust 7, 2017
Government Improperly Disallowed Costs that Were Never Accrued or Charged; ASBCA No. 60190, Appeal of Northrop Grumman CorporationAugust 7, 2017
Failure to Meet Incumbent Contract’s OCI Obligations Blocks Protester from Competing for Follow-On; COFC No. 17-835C, A Squared Joint Venture v. United StatesAugust 4, 2017
Contractor Did Not Argue Same Legal Theories in Claim, Appeal; COFC No. 13-626C, Michael Roth & Associates Architects & Planners Inc. v United StatesAugust 4, 2017
