★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/AseraCare 11th Circuit Case Holds Differences in Hospice Clinical Opinions Are Insufficient to Demonstrate Falsity Under the FCA
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

AseraCare 11th Circuit Case Holds Differences in Hospice Clinical Opinions Are Insufficient to Demonstrate Falsity Under the FCA

Last week’s ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. AseraCare is a win for hospice and other health care providers who have long argued that a mere difference of clinical opinion among physicians is not enough to prove falsity under the False Claims Act. While the AseraCare ruling specifically applied in the context of hospice reimbursement, it is in line with prior rulings regarding provider judgment and will clearly impact other cases nationwide.

Read the full post at Foley & Lardner

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.