★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/Agreement to Repay Liquidated Damages Not a Contract that Grants Court Jurisdiction to Hear Complaint Related to Appeal Pending Before ASBCA; COFC No. 19-531C, Fortis Networks Inc. v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Agreement to Repay Liquidated Damages Not a Contract that Grants Court Jurisdiction to Hear Complaint Related to Appeal Pending Before ASBCA; COFC No. 19-531C, Fortis Networks Inc. v. United States

The government’s motion to dismiss a request for a temporary restraining order barring the agency from using offsets to collect a debt is granted, where the plaintiff already appealed the CO’s final decision before ASBCA, and where a voluntary installment repayment agreement between the agency and the plaintiff did not present a separate contract that would give the court jurisdiction to hear a complaint related to a case already before a different venue.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.