Supreme Court Says Suits Challenging Terminated Grants Should Be Filed in the COFC

The Department of Education terminated several grants. The recipients challenged the terminations in federal district court. The district court issued a temporary restraining order, enjoining the terminations. The district court found the terminations likely violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The government asked the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate the TRO. In a recently issued decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government and stayed the TRO. The Supreme Court held that the district court likely lacked jurisdiction under the APA because the APA’s waiver of government immunity does not extend to a suit to enforce “a contractual obligation to pay money.” Instead, the court opined that the suit should have been brought under the Tucker Act in the Court of Federal Claims.

[pdf-embedder url=”https://staging.pub-k.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Dept.-of-Ed-v.-California.pdf” title=”Dept. of Ed v. California”]