Contractor Alleged Differing Site Conditions. Why Did ASBCA Reject the Claim?
The appellant argued it was damaged by a materially differing site conditions—specifically, a void where a temporary retaining structure (TRS) was to be constructed and the presence of timber piles.
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
$750/year