★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Supreme Court Wades into Academic Dispute over Government Dismissal in Non-Intervened Qui Tam Cases
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Supreme Court Wades into Academic Dispute over Government Dismissal in Non-Intervened Qui Tam Cases

The Supreme Court’s order granting certiorari in Polansky v. Executive Health Resources signals its intention to settle a circuit court split on the procedure and standard by which the government can exercise its dismissal authority under the False Claims Act in declined qui tam cases. The Court’s decision to expend its resources on this question—as opposed to ones of far greater importance that remain unresolved—is somewhat surprising. That is because, in reality, the government rarely deploys its broad powers to dismiss—although it has exercised this power more after the issuance of the “Granston Memo”—and that reluctance to act both predates the circuit split and cannot be attributed to it.

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.