★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Cyber & Privacy/Implications of Judge Jackson’s Confirmation for Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigations Going Forward
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Cyber & Privacy Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Cyber & Privacy Brief

Implications of Judge Jackson’s Confirmation for Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigations Going Forward

Incoming Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ruled on over 500 cases during her tenure on the bench. Her rulings on privacy rights do not appear to be substantively different from those of Justice Breyer. Many consider Judge Jackson ideologically similar to Justice Breyer, and her experience clerking for him undoubtedly shaped her jurisprudence. Justice Breyer was fairly reliable in upholding digital privacy rights. For example, Justice Breyer sided in favor of digital privacy in Van Buren v. United States, and he penned a partial dissent in Barr v. Association of Political Consultants. Judge Jackson has given no reason to believe she would rule much differently.

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.