★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Deal or No Deal: Deciding to Settle or Litigate When Faced with a DOJ or SEC Enforcement Action Under the Current Administration
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Deal or No Deal: Deciding to Settle or Litigate When Faced with a DOJ or SEC Enforcement Action Under the Current Administration

For those facing a potential enforcement recommendation at the close of a white collar investigation, choosing whether to litigate against or settle with the government agency is a critical strategic crossroads. Recent statements by officials from both the DOJ and SEC have provided clarification on what factors to consider when making that decision. Specifically, these statements have indicated an increased threshold to receive cooperation credit, stricter compliance and monitorship requirements, and a potential easing of the former administration’s “anti-piling on” policy. Broadly, these statements evince a government enforcement regime that both increases the risk of litigation but also expands the cost of settlement. Accordingly, it is more important than ever for those facing an enforcement action to seek advice on what to do when the government comes calling.

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.