★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/To Intervene or Not to Intervene?: The Third Circuit Sides With the Seventh Circuit on Assessing Government Motions to Dismiss
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

To Intervene or Not to Intervene?: The Third Circuit Sides With the Seventh Circuit on Assessing Government Motions to Dismiss

The Third Circuit is the latest circuit court to jump into the Section 3730(c)(2)(A) fray and weigh in on the appropriate standard for dismissal of a qui tam action over a relator’s objections. In Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the Third Circuit concluded that, to seek dismissal after a prior declination, the government must first intervene and, once it does so, its dismissal motion must satisfy Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). No. 19-3810 (3d Cir. Oct. 28, 2021).

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.