News/Compliance & Enforcement/Earlier Qui Tam Complaint Didn’t Name Defendant, but Still Should Have Put Government on Notice of Alleged Conduct; United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, No. 1:20-cv-61, U.S. ex rel. Jimmy Allen, et al. v. The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, Ohio

False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Earlier Qui Tam Complaint Didn’t Name Defendant, but Still Should Have Put Government on Notice of Alleged Conduct; United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, No. 1:20-cv-61, U.S. ex rel. Jimmy Allen, et al. v. The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, Ohio

Bill OlverSeptember 30, 2021 · 4 min read

🔒 Members Only

The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss as untimely a qui tam complaint alleging healthcare fraud.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.

$750/year

Become a Member

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.