★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Cyber & Privacy/Lessons Learned From Eleventh Circuit’s Dismissal of Data Breach Suit Alleging Only Increased Risk of Future Harm for Lack of Article III Standing
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Cyber & Privacy Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Cyber & Privacy Brief

Lessons Learned From Eleventh Circuit’s Dismissal of Data Breach Suit Alleging Only Increased Risk of Future Harm for Lack of Article III Standing

In the context of data breach class action litigation, the question of whether Article III standing can be satisfied is often dispositive of the outcome of an action. However, a deep circuit split currently exists between the federal appellate courts regarding the level of proof required to establish standing in data breach class actions— particularly as it relates to demonstrating a sufficiently “concrete” injury-in-fact and whether allegations of an increased risk of future identity theft are sufficient to satisfy this aspect of the standing test.

Source:

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.