★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Relator’s Relocation Irrelevant When Complaint Has No Evidence Employer Asked Government to Reimburse Costs; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Aiken Division, No. No. 1:19-cv-00196-JMC, U.S. ex rel. Peter Michael Wanco Jr. v. MOX Services LLC and Orano Federal Services LLC
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Relator’s Relocation Irrelevant When Complaint Has No Evidence Employer Asked Government to Reimburse Costs; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Aiken Division, No. No. 1:19-cv-00196-JMC, U.S. ex rel. Peter Michael Wanco Jr. v. MOX Services LLC and Orano Federal Services LLC

The district court dismissed a qui tam complaint alleging the defendant submitted an improper claim to the government for reimbursement of employee relocation benefits and unlawfully retaliated against the relator for other protected activity.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.