★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Summary Judgment Inappropriate When Many Facts Remain in Dispute; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 02-2964, U.S. ex rel. Yoash Gohil v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., et al.
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Summary Judgment Inappropriate When Many Facts Remain in Dispute; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 02-2964, U.S. ex rel. Yoash Gohil v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., et al.

The district court denied both parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in a case alleging violations of the Anti-Kickback Act and False Claims Act, finding that neither had fully settled the issues of falsity, materiality, or scienter.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.