★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Supreme Court Declines to Provide Guidance on FCA Pleading Requirements
Free SampleYou’re reading a free sample of the Compliance & Enforcement Brief. Members get every case digest like this, six days a week.See Membership Options
Expert Opinion·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Supreme Court Declines to Provide Guidance on FCA Pleading Requirements

On October 1, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Court to weigh in on just how precisely a whistleblower must plead the submission of a false claim. Since the False Claims Act prohibits the knowing submission of false claims to the government, the question courts have struggled with is whether the “who, what, when, where, and how” requirements of fraud pleading extend to facts alleged in support of the nexus between fraudulent schemes and presentment of claims. For the time being, lower courts are left to continue to grapple with this issue without Supreme Court input.

Read the full post at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP

Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.