Work Proposed for Similarly Situated Entities Correctly Aggregated with Prime Contractor; SBA No. SIZ-5954, Size Appeal of Synaptek Corp.
Appeal of the area office’s determination that the awardee is an eligible small business for the subject procurement is denied, where the awardee was not unusually reliant on its subcontractors in violation of the ostensible subcontractor rule, and where the area office properly concluded that two of the four proposed subcontractors were similarly situated entities, and aggregated the work they were proposed to perform with the work proposed for the prime contractor.
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
$750/year
