★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/The Silent No: Initial Adverse Agency Action Can Simply Be No Action at All
Expert Opinion·Protests & Claims Brief

The Silent No: Initial Adverse Agency Action Can Simply Be No Action at All

Coming on the heels of a decision presenting two timeliness reminders, which we addressed in “GAO Presents a Study in Timeliness Traps,” the GAO once again issued a decision last week presenting a third timeliness trap of which protesters must be wary.  In MLS-Multinational Logistics Services, Ltd., B-415782; B-415708.2, March 7, 2018, ___ CPD ¶ ___, the GAO dismissed a protester’s challenge to the terms of two solicitations where the protester did not file a protest at the GAO within 10 days of initial adverse agency action on an agency-level protest.  The “trap” came down when the initial adverse agency action came not with a direct response to the agency-level protest but with mere silence.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.