★ ANNUAL REVIEW 2027 SPONSORSHIPS NOW OPEN   Learn more →

Log In  |  Become a Member  |  Sponsor  |  ⌕ Search

News/Protests & Claims/Plaintiff Does Not Have to Allege Breach of Specific Contract Obligation to Argue Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; COFC No. 16-268C, Canpro Investments Ltd. v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Plaintiff Does Not Have to Allege Breach of Specific Contract Obligation to Argue Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; COFC No. 16-268C, Canpro Investments Ltd. v. United States

Government’s motion for reconsideration of the Court of Federal Claims’ decision finding the plaintiff had reasonably stated a breach of contract claim is denied, where the plaintiff did not have to allege a breach of a specific contractual obligation to demonstrate a violation of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and where the government did not demonstrate it used a leased property in a customary and reasonable manner in accordance with the physical limitations of the premises.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every case digest, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.